
In the medical community, there appears to exist an underlying conspiracy of racial and gender basis. Survival rates post coronary event are slightly lower for black and female victims than for white males, with an especially significant higher mortality rate for young black females. The fact that medicine, which should be the bastion of color and gender equality, falls short for any member of our society has been studied to better understand the dynamics of the failure and separate prejudice from other contributing factors. Outright malpractice is not the problem in most cases. Instead, several subtler mechanisms seem to be operating. Access to medical facilities is dependant on financial status, regional availability, and the patient's insurance company preferences. Delaying or forgoing treatment while waiting for referrals or the next paycheck can negatively impact the prognosis. While public health alerts appear to reach the more economically fortunate in society, who have altered life-styles to include weight, cholesterol, and stress management, smoking cessation, and the benefits of aerobic fitness, the messages are not making the same impact on the underprivileged. Interestingly, poor families who have maintained a traditional ethnic diet are less likely to suffer from cardiac disease. Most research studies use healthy white males, with few preexisting medical conditions, to obtain data about new drugs, treatments, and effectiveness of diagnostic tools. The results are statistically significant, but have an obvious glaring error built in. The studies use healthy white males. What can be said about healthy white males is only what can be applied to white males - not to white females, black males, black females, or any other group. Coronary disease in men usually begins earlier than in women. Men typically exhibit a range of classically described symptoms, while women frequently have subtler signs that mimic other ailments. Mr. Jones, in the example, has textbook symptoms. In addition, he has diagnostic changes in his EKG. As an additional benefit of his socio-economic status, he has a more thorough medical history. At 50, Mrs. Smith is young for a heart attack. Hormones usually protect women until well past menopause. Her EKG is unremarkable - a common finding in blacks due to structural differences in the heart wall. EKGs are also more difficult to perform properly on the obese. Due to her financial condition, she hasn't sought out routine exams and has no comprehensive documentation of her medical history. An experienced physician may have ordered cardiac marker tests on Mrs. Smith but, with negative EKG and no symptoms plus the positive history for under-treated diabetes and high blood pressure, he may have not have considered her fainting spell to be more than a side effect of one or the other. Another problem in deciding whether medicine is neglecting some citizens is establishing the consequences of patient noncompliance. People resist medical care for a number of reasons, including the cost of medications and treatments, forgetfulness, denial, distrust of doctors, or misunderstanding of instructions due to language barrier or hearing disability. Proper diagnosis of a patient requires a thorough risk history assessment, something many busy doctors may not do, relying instead on paramedic or nursing notes and the results of the EKG or blood tests. Unfortunately, the normal ranges these tests were established by the same studies that used white males as the study subjects. In some cases, only a patient's verbal history can support a doctor's decision to test further. In recognition of the flaws in the current studies, more research organizations and drug companies are targeting the special problems of minority groups and women. These studies will take years to collect the body of data current available on white males. In the meantime, all people need to be aware of the shortcomings of the present tools and insist on more thorough follow-up testing if the initial studies are inconclusive. Compiling a family history can help determine if a genetic tendency exists for coronary disease. Keeping copies of results and interpretations, especially if one relocates frequently, can expedite diagnosis and treatment. Inform the doctor or nurse if the victim has multiple risk factors. These include cigarette smoking, high blood pressure, high total cholesterol or LDL cholesterol, low HDL cholesterol, being overweight, having a sedentary life-style, and diabetes. In a landmark project, the Nurses' Health Study polled over 84,000 women of all races and walks of life. Over a fourteen-year period, the researchers sent questionnaires to each woman every two years. The form inquired about weight, physical condition, smoking status, menopause, hormone usage, cholesterol, blood pressure, new medications, and other factors. The single most beneficial thing a woman can do, in regards to the health of her heart, is stop smoking. Meeting all five risk-lowering criteria (non-smoker, low body fat ratio, healthy diet, regular exercise, and a routine nightcap) can reduce the chance of heart attack by as much as 80%. Even two of these risk-lowering behaviors, in addition to not smoking, proved to be successful in lowering a woman's risk by 28%. In a perfect society, everyone would have the same risks, the same treatment, and the same outcomes. In a society of unique individuals, where everyone has different risks, different treatments, and wildly variable outcomes, we all have identical responsibilities. Manage our risks. Take charge of our treatments. Demand a positive outcome. The key to avoiding or surviving a heart attack isn't in the hands of your doctor, or the hospital, or your insurance plan. The key jingles in your own pocket. Will you use it?
References
|
Copyright ©
2002 Lisa J. Binkley
All rights reserved
About the Author
|
Lisa Binkley works within the medical
industry and is the popular author of this health series in the Kudzu
Monthly. She serves as the fiction editor of this ezine and also edits
for the online science fiction magazineDistant Worlds. |
![]() |
|
Reader's Comments |
Kudzu Monthly urges all readers to provide feedback for the authors and editors of articles on this site. If you would like to comment on this article, you can enter your comments in the form below. They will be added to this page. |
|
This is absolutely new approach to hypercholesterolemia treatment. Dr. Dzugan Med Hypotheses 2002 Nov;59(6):751-6 Related Articles, Links Hypercholesterolemia treatment: a new hypothesis or just an accident? Dzugan SA, Arnold Smith R. North Central Mississippi Regional Cancer Center, Mississippi, Greenwood, USA A new hypothesis concerning the association of low levels of steroid hormones and hypercholesterolemia is proposed. This study presents data that concurrent restoration to youthful levels of multiple normally found steroid hormones is able to normalize or improve serum total cholesterol (TC). We evaluated 20 patients with hypercholesterolemia who received hormonorestorative therapy (HT) with natural hormones. Hundred percent of patients responded. Mean serum TC was 263.5mg/dL before and 187.9mg/dL after treatment. Serum TC dropped below 200mg/dL in 60.0%. No morbidity or mortality related to HT was observed. In patients characterized by hypercholesterolemia and sub-youthful serum steroidal hormones, our findings support the hypothesis that hypercholesterolemia is a compensatory mechanism for life-cycle related down-regulation of steroid hormones, and that broadband steroid hormone restoration is associated with a substantial drop in serum TC in many patients. Sergey A. Dzugan <sdzugan@tecinfo.com> - Monday, May 05, 2003 at 12:07:22 (EDT) Hello Lisa, I am very interested in this subject. I am a current cardiac patient, who at 48 under went Bypass Surgery last July 2001. I am currently interested in how your above article may also pertain to persons with a mental health diagnosis. I remember reading an article in regards to this type of discrimination a while back. Now I can't seem to find any info at all on the subject. That article may originally appeared in the Johns Hopkins web site. If I remember correctly, it focused on the Byass in Cardiac treatment for the mentally ill. If you have any info or thoughts on this subject I would appreciate hearing from you. Michael J Pease <m-pease@msn.com> - Wednesday, August 21, 2002 at 22:39:57 (EDT) I am always so impressed with your health column, Lisa. The inequality in health care is alarming and needs addressing. Meanwhile this article shows us the necessity to demand access to the best diagnostic and preventative measures available. Brenda Ross <brerfox@dowco.com> - Sunday, August 11, 2002 at 15:39:21 (EDT) What a thorough and well researched article - many thanks for this one, which could well save lives. I have studied the list of symptoms of a heart attack, and will bear it in mind. Always good to be well prepared. Cecile Hare <cecilehare@go.com> - Tuesday, August 06, 2002 at 09:08:49 (EDT) |
